BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
PRODID:-//Tendenci - The Open Source AMS for Associations//Tendenci Codeba
se MIMEDIR//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
DESCRIPTION:--- This iCal file does *NOT* confirm registration.\nEvent det
ails subject to change. ---\nhttps://www.swsaapg.org/events/36/\n\nEvent T
itle: PBSSEPM Fall Field Trip\nStart Date / Time: Nov 11, 2011 06:30 AM US
/Central\nLocation: Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico\nSpeaker: Dr. Xavier
Janson\nGoogle\nhttp://maps.google.com/maps?q=601+Corona+Place,Cloudcroft,
NM\n\nForecast\nhttp://www.weather.com/weather/monthly/\n\n\n \n PERMIAN
BASIN SECTION SEPM FALL FIELD TRIP\n \n \n \n November 11th&ndash\; 13t
h, 2011\n \n Registrations must be received by October 28th, 2011, 5:00 p
.m. in PBS-SEPM office\n \n \n \n Paleozoic mounds stratigraphic archit
ecture in the Sacramento Mountains:\n \n implication for reservoir charac
terizations\n \n \n \n Dr. Xavier Janson\n \n Reservoir Characterizati
on Research Laboratory\n \n Bureau of Economic Geology\n \n University O
f Texas at Austin\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n This two day trip will use
the unique suite of carbonate outcrops in Sacramento Mountains to illustr
ate reservoir-scale stratalarchitecture and methodologies for interpreting
these carbonate mounds geometries from contained facies. Two different pl
atform style of mounds development will be visited. The Mississippian moun
ds grew on a wide low angle ramp below wave base and are dominated by apho
tic to oligophoticbiota, whereas the Virgilian algal mounds are dominated
by euphotic biota that depends on light to grow and has a result are contr
olled not only by the hydrodynamic regime but also the water depth (accomm
odation). We will draw comparison with the subsurface data from the Horse
shoe Atoll and in the Fort Worth Basin where these two types of mounds are
present or at least suspected whenever possible. We will contrast the two
stratigraphic architectures and discuss the applicability of these outcro
p and outcrop-derived conceptual model to the isolated platform case in Ho
rseshoe Atoll and Forth Worth Basin.\n \n \n \n Day 1: Mississippia
n outer-ramp deposits and associated mud mounds: Mississippian Lake Valle
y mid- and outer-ramp deposits and buildups are well displayed across the
west-facing wall of the Sacramento Mountains for some 12 miles in an appro
ximate dip orientation. We will examine mound geometries, flank beds, and
crinoidalgravity flows at three locations along the Lake Valley ramp. The
most updiplocality will consist of small mound complexes, followed by larg
er mounds complexes and large lobatecrinoidalrudstonedeposits in Alamo Can
yon downdip. Finally, we will then examine the famous Muleshoe mud mound i
n a more downdipposition along the ramp profile. These exposures will give
us the opportunity to compare stages of mound growth&mdash\;including len
ticular, aggradational, and laterally accreting along the updipto downdipa
ccommodation profile of the Lake Valley ramp&mdash\;with the phylloid-alga
l mound we&lsquo\;ll see the next day in the Pennsylvanian. We will also e
xamine the stratalgeometries of outer-ramp crinoidalturbiditelobes. We wil
l discuss similarities and differences between phylloid-algal and crinoid
mounds and try to make some generalization about other skeletal-mound syst
ems, such as Cretaceous rudistmounds.\n \n \n \n Day 2: Mixed s
iliciclasticUpper Carboniferous shelf in Dry Canyon: icehouse cyclicityand
mound-dominated margin architecture The Dry Canyon area of the Sacramento
Mountains is a classic exposure of complex icehouse-mixed-siliciclastic-c
arbonate strata deposited in shallow-water-shelf, shelf-margin, and slope
settings. The narrow shelf exposed in Dry Canyon will allow us to contrast
faciesdistribution and proportion, stratalgeometries, and cycle architect
ure between the shelf interior and the shelf margin. We will examine strat
algeometries and cycle boundaries typical of high-amplitude, sea-level cha
nges found in icehouse conditions. We will observe variations of phylloid-
algal mound size, shape, and distribution in three dimensions and between
two distinct stratigraphic intervals. We will examine and discuss the infl
uence of antecedent topography and differential compaction on facies/cycle
architecture and, ultimately, reservoir quality.\n \n \n \n Do
wnload Registration\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n--- This iCal file does *NOT
* confirm registration.Event details subject to change. ---\n\n--- By Tend
enci - The Open Source AMS for Associations ---\n
UID:uid36@swsaapg.org
SUMMARY:PBSSEPM Fall Field Trip
DTSTART:20111111T123000Z
DTEND:20111113T220000Z
CLASS:PUBLIC
PRIORITY:5
DTSTAMP:20260414T064249Z
TRANSP:OPAQUE
SEQUENCE:0
LOCATION:Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:--- This iCal file does *NOT* confirm re
gistration.Event details subject to change. ---
Event Title: PBSS
EPM Fall Field Trip
https://www.swsaapg.org/events/36/
When: Nov 11, 2011 06:30 AM US/Central
Speaker: Dr. Xavier
Janson
Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico
601 Corona Place<
br />Cloudcroft, NM
http://maps.google.com/maps?q=601+Corona+Pla
ce,Cloudcroft,NM
Forecast: http://www.weather.com/weather/
monthly/
P
ERMIAN BASIN SECTION SEPM FALL FIELD TRIP
\;
November 11th&ndash\; 13th, 2011 <
div style="text-align: center"> Registrations must be received by Octobe
r 28th, 2011, 5:00 p.m. in PBS-SEPM office
\;
<
div style="text-align: center"> Paleozoic mounds stratigraphic a
rchitecture in the Sacramento Mountains: implication for reservoir characterizations
\;
Dr. Xavier Janson
R
eservoir Characterization Research Laboratory
Bureau of Economic Geology
University Of Texas at Austin
\;
\;
\;This two day trip will use the un
ique suite of carbonate outcrops in Sacramento Mountains to illustrate res
ervoir-scale stratalarchitecture and methodologies for interpreting these
carbonate mounds geometries from contained facies. Two different platform
style of mounds development will be visited. The Mississippian mounds grew
on a wide low angle ramp below wave base and are dominated by aphotic to
oligophoticbiota, whereas the Virgilian algal mounds are dominated by euph
otic biota that depends on light to grow and has a result are controlled n
ot only by the hydrodynamic regime but also the water depth (accommodation
). \; We will draw comparison with the subsurface data from the Horses
hoe Atoll and in the Fort Worth Basin where these two types of mounds are
present or at least suspected whenever possible. We will contrast the two
stratigraphic architectures and discuss the applicability of these outcrop
and outcrop-derived conceptual model to the isolated platform case in Hor
seshoe Atoll and Forth Worth Basin. \;
Day 1: Mississippian outer-ramp deposits and associated mud mounds:
\;Mississippian Lake Valley mid- and outer-ramp deposits and
buildups are well displayed across the west-facing wall of the Sacramento
Mountains for some 12 miles in an approximate dip orientation. We will ex
amine mound geometries, flank beds, and crinoidalgravity flows at three lo
cations along the Lake Valley ramp. The most updiplocality will consist of
small mound complexes, followed by larger mounds complexes and large loba
tecrinoidalrudstonedeposits in Alamo Canyon downdip. Finally, we will then
examine the famous Muleshoe mud mound in a more downdipposition along the
ramp profile. These exposures will give us the opportunity to compare sta
ges of mound growth&mdash\;including lenticular, aggradational, and latera
lly accreting along the updipto downdipaccommodation profile of the Lake V
alley ramp&mdash\;with the phylloid-algal mound we&lsquo\;ll see the next
day in the Pennsylvanian. We will also examine the stratalgeometries of ou
ter-ramp crinoidalturbiditelobes. We will discuss similarities and differe
nces between phylloid-algal and crinoid mounds and try to make some genera
lization about other skeletal-mound systems, such as Cretaceous rudistmoun
ds. \;
Day 2: Mixed silicicla
sticUpper Carboniferous shelf in Dry Canyon: icehouse cyclicityan
d mound-dominated margin architecture The Dry Canyon area of the Sacrament
o Mountains is a classic exposure of complex icehouse-mixed-siliciclastic-
carbonate strata deposited in shallow-water-shelf, shelf-margin, and slope
settings. The narrow shelf exposed in Dry Canyon will allow us to contras
t faciesdistribution and proportion, stratalgeometries, and cycle architec
ture between the shelf interior and the shelf margin. We will examine stra
talgeometries and cycle boundaries typical of high-amplitude, sea-level ch
anges found in icehouse conditions. We will observe variations of phylloid
-algal mound size, shape, and distribution in three dimensions and between
two distinct stratigraphic intervals. We will examine and discuss the inf
luence of antecedent topography and differential compaction on facies/cycl
e architecture and, ultimately, reservoir quality.
&nbs
p\;
\;
--- This iCal file does *NOT* confirm reg
istration.Event details subject to change. ---
--- Tendenci®\
; Software by
tendenci.com - The Op
en Source AMS for Associations ---
